Skip to main content
A third perpetuals venue, kept apart from the other two on purpose.

Why it is not folded in with the others

Three differences, each of which would corrupt a shared table:
  • Funding settles hourly. A complete day is twenty-four intervals, not three. Annualising it with the other venues’ factor overstates by eight, and the two numbers look equally plausible side by side.
  • Open interest has no history at all. The venue reports it as it is now. There is nothing to backfill and never will be.
  • History begins 2023-05-12, the venue’s own start. An empty answer for 2021 is correct rather than a failure.
Folding these into the same day rows would need one “is this day complete” test that has to know which venue wrote each row.

What it gives that the others do not

Liquidations with the address. No centralised venue publishes who was liquidated. Here each forced close carries the address, the fill price, the mark price at the time, whether it was taken at market or backstopped, and which HLP vault absorbed it.
Live state per coin, not just BTC and ETH: the current hourly funding rate, open interest, oracle and mark price, and the premium between them — which is what funding is computed from and the cleanest single reading of whether the perpetual is trading rich.

It records forward only

Because neither series can be fetched retrospectively, this stream contains exactly what has been watched and nothing earlier. Both responses say so.
A reader cannot tell a short history from a quiet market by looking at the rows. That is why the answer states when the record begins rather than leaving it to be inferred.

Status

The endpoints are deployed and behind the same key as everything else. The watcher that fills them runs on a schedule; until it has, they answer with what is missing and why rather than with an empty list.

Related topics

What we hold